image

If Putin “is not stopped in Ukraine!”

If Putin is not stopped in Ukraine!

My last post on Russia’s future brought some criticism that if Putin “was not stopped in Ukraine” then he would aim to takeover other nearby countries — including much of Europe! In my view, Putin would certainly like to recreate some version of “Russia” as it did — or might have — existed in the past, but this does not mean he hankers over the USSR or European physical control.
I accept that in the absence of NATO strength his “Russian idea” would include much of the Baltic countries. This becomes an issue for NATO and what it stands for! I doubt that — even with Trump — Putin would want to get directly involved in such a messy fight.
Apart from NATO members, the only really exposed country is Georgia — particularly because of a common border.
While there may be “Russian orientated separatists” in northern Kazakhstan, any Russian move to annex this territory would be forcibly resisted by Astana (implicitly backed by China which does not want instability in this area). The Nordic countries (even without NATO) would be tough nuts to crack, as would Azerbaijan (which would be strongly backed by Turkiye).
Finally, I want to point out that Putin in his “dictator” role is necessarily less severe than North Korea etc. Russians have knowledge and experience of the “West” and basics of democracy and Putin must take considerable notice of public opinion. He needs some story of “victory” that protects his personal future (in any form). While starting another significant war (apart from Ukraine) might appeal to some Russias, my view is that it would be the beginning of a general public revolt.

What would happen if Ukraine surrendered NOW!

What would happen if Ukraine Surrended NOW!

I first went to Russia in 1991 and finally left in October 2022 – that is, eight months after the February invasion of Ukraine! So, I have not been there for 4 years and my opinions should be read with this in mind.

I know from my own conversations in 2022 that while most Russians were unhappy about the invasion there were also optimistic feelings held by many that a quick war would enhance Russian greatness – mostly measured by larger territory. There was also a stunning immediate fear generated shutdown in critical analysis and speech with even close friends referring to the “special military operation” rather than invasion or war.

There would initially be a great heave of relief if the war suddenly ended with Russian “victory’.

Within a few short months most Russians would move on have firmly focused their thoughts on the future of the lives and their civil society. While Putin would still be seen as a great hero there would be increasing talk about the need to revitalize and repair the non-military economy. Putin – and his closest associates – would know that this is a logical necessity but emotionally could not allow any significant move to decentralize power to achieve this. Words would be said about democracy and free elections but little would be done in practice.

There would likely to be two specific forces exerting themselves below the surface public discourse. One is the ambitions of people in the 30 to 50 or so age range who feel that the time has come for them to achieve their ambitions – and they will be increasingly angry that Putin and Co. would not move on. Many of these people would be in official positions in Moscow and the regions but many would just want nothing to do with the government sector and have been keeping their heads down during the conflict. The other force is the return of many soldiers – and their guns – into domestic life. Psychological reintegration would not be as easy as resorting to whatever violence eases their path.

Economic recovery would not be rapid. The stimulus of military expenditure would decline and foreign investment would be minimal given the past asset expropriations. Putin would make overtures to the Europe but would not be well received while the United States under Donald Trump would aim to be more politically accommodative.

While Putin Vladimir is alive – in whatever capacity – Russia would be stuck in a sort of nowhere land. Internally, Putin would just be there with his shadow looming over everything and restricting significant change. Externally, no friends that really care about it (not even China), a neighbor whose citizens absolutely hate it (Ukraine) and would engage in revenge killings, and a remaining world that just wants to keep its distance.

Finally, Russia would not fall apart and it would not invade a NATO country.

 

 

Geopolitcs is all the rage now

Geopolitics is all the rage now!

Geopolitcs is all the rage now, and is leading some “analysts” to say things about Russia that display ignorance. Here Tina Fordham — talking to Pyotr Kurzin — suggests that Russia might breakup due to ethnic tensions (she mentions non-Slavs in Siberia) or Chinese annexation in the Russian Far East. 

Of course, nothing is impossible, but:

(a) I lived in Siberia for several years (in Irkutsk until 2022) and while some indigenous groups might hanker for independence, the number of Slavs and the power of the Russian state is such that these will remain dreams;

(b) While some Chinese would like to see Vladivostok and Primorsky Province etc part of China (even if only improving access to the sea for some northern China areas), this geographical area is very “Russian” — as I know from my time living and working there in the 1990s! Here Tina seems to suggest that Chinese commercial advances could be followed by political and military action. No matter who is in power in Moscow, any Chinese military action in the region would be met with nuclear weapons.

Tina Fordham also talks about Putin losing Central Asia and Armenia. She is right in both cases, but Central Asian countries are just becoming more nationalistic rather than Russia haters — as I can also attest from spending a lot of time there. There is no new “Great Game” for influence in the region!

Armenia is, as Fordham suggests, a “strategically significant” country but in reality it is not strategically significant to Russia in any geographical, economic, or military sense.

You can watch Fordham and Kurzin podcast here: