In a recent edition of the “All-in Podcast”, participant David Sacks went out of his way to emphasis that he was “not defying” President Trump and using the banned “artificial intelligence” (AI) term. Instead, he was using the mandated “super-intelligence” (SI). His craven approach to Trump in a country where the 1st Amendment of the Constitution guarantees free speech may just be a reflection of his character.
 

After the February 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine I was living in Russia and personally knew and encountered many people who insisted on referring to the mandated “special military operation” rather than the obvious “war” or “invasion”. For these Russians using the wrong term could mean jail.
 
However, David Sacks – like his pod-cast friends – was probably just afraid of some adverse effect on his ability to make money. The same could be said for Peter H. Diamandis and his “Moonshots” podcast team.
 
In Australia there is a push for an official and mandated definition of “antisemitism” which would be similar in concept to defining who is a Jew in Nazi Germany.
 
In Britain a police-led crackdown on free-speech has echoes of Gestapo and KGB tactics, which is something that Jilian Segal and many Israel supporters want in Australia in order to suppress criticisms of mass killing in Gaza. They totally fail to understand that Benjamin Netanyahu has a similar religious fervor to that driving Vladimir Putin’s ethic visions in Ukraine – the only difference is that Netanyahu wants to kill to purify Israel whereas Putin want to kill to unify “ethnic Russians”.

Maybe we will eventually need a Hermann Goering to decide “who is a Jew” or who is a anti-semite!
 
David Sacks cowardice can be seen here at the very beginning of All-in Podcast: